----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42164/#review114149 -----------------------------------------------------------
src/master/validation.cpp (line 699) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/42164/#comment174965> First thing here is that the `principal` field in `ReservationInfo` is still marked `required`. What's our plan for changing it to `optional`? Second thing is that even if `principal.isNone()`, if is authorization is turned off we don't care, right? That is, if authorization is turned off, even frameworks without a principal can reserve any resources? - Michael Park On Jan. 13, 2016, 2:45 a.m., Greg Mann wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/42164/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 13, 2016, 2:45 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Alexander Rojas, Michael Park, and Neil Conway. > > > Bugs: MESOS-3940 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3940 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Allowed (un)reserve operations without a principal. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/master/validation.cpp 6a43bce5b7df6a9d939245c4726d060fa19eb305 > src/tests/master_validation_tests.cpp > fbf8fadbc04a7cbc60ee6091e0224339389b400f > src/tests/reservation_endpoints_tests.cpp > b8edd6fafedd4c2221a8d19c1ebc71254071a8c7 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42164/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Two master validation tests were removed which tested to make sure that > reserve and unreserve operations would not succeed without a principal. > > `make check` was used to test on both OSX and Ubuntu 14.04 > > > Thanks, > > Greg Mann > >
