> On Jan. 13, 2016, 6:59 p.m., Till Toenshoff wrote:
> > src/tests/environment.cpp, lines 315-329
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/42197/diff/1/?file=1194614#file1194614line315>
> >
> >     Why would we not show this warning to users on e.g. OSX?
> >     
> >     Right now I would assume that it makes sense to show this for all 
> > platforms that dont run the tests, just like we do e.g. for the below 
> > netcat stuff. Or am I missing something?

Perf is only available on Linux. But yes, it makes sense to inform the users of 
other platforms why these tests have been disabled, like `CfsFilter` or 
`DockerFilter`.


- Jan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42197/#review114238
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 13, 2016, 4:23 p.m., Jan Schlicht wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/42197/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 13, 2016, 4:23 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier and Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3082
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3082
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Virtual machines may not always support 'CPU performance counters'. Tests
> trying to collect to 'cycle' value of 'perf' will fail under these
> circumstances. This will be avoided by disabling these tests if 'perf' 
> hardware
> events are not available.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/environment.cpp 20218a086baefcefb310eb45ed9024e5425ce787 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42197/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `sudo ./bin/mesos-tests.sh 
> --gtest_filter="*ROOT_CGROUPS_Perf:*ROOT_CGROUPS_Sample:*ROOT_CGROUPS_UserCgroup:*CGROUPS_ROOT_PerfRollForward:*ROOT_Sample"`
>  in a VM without 'CPU performance counters'. This doesn't run any tests, as 
> expected.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jan Schlicht
> 
>

Reply via email to