-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41791/#review115279
-----------------------------------------------------------


Is there some reason why you've split up these reviews into three pieces?  
(42113 and 42194)

See below for my confusion:


src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp (line 676)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/41791/#comment176234>

    I see several places where you overwrite changes from this review in the 
subsequent two.  Did you mean to have three reviews for the changes to 
`::updateAllocation`, `::updateAvailable`, and `::recoverResources`?


- Joseph Wu


On Jan. 14, 2016, 4:44 a.m., Guangya Liu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/41791/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 14, 2016, 4:44 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Artem Harutyunyan, Joris Van 
> Remoortere, Joseph Wu, Klaus Ma, and Jian Qiu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4145
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4145
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Update allocation slack resources if reserve some
> new stateless reserved resources. For such case,
> the allocation slack resources will be increased.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp 
> d541bfa3f4190865c65d35c9d1ffdb8a3f194056 
>   src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_tests.cpp 
> e044f832c2c16e53e663c6ced5452649bb0dcb59 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41791/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Guangya Liu
> 
>

Reply via email to