-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42368/#review115715
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/tests/reservation_endpoints_tests.cpp (lines 1159 - 1160)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/42368/#comment176752>

    Can we leave the `TODO` here saying this should work and should be fixed in 
`0.28`? There are like 5 or 6 cases in this test, so the note at the top 
doesn't tell us which ones need to be updated.



src/tests/reservation_endpoints_tests.cpp (line 1161)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/42368/#comment176749>

    Can we name these as `dynamicallyReservedWithNoPrincipal`, and for the rest 
as well? e.g. `dynamicallyReservedWithDefaultPrincipal`.



src/tests/reservation_endpoints_tests.cpp (lines 1174 - 1176)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/42368/#comment176760>

    (1) `HTTP authorization`? -- Isn't it authentication?
    
    (2) `and dynamic reservations are currently unallowed without a principal`? 
-- What does this mean? We passed a `ReservationInfo` with a `principal` set 
here, and generally, passing `None()` as the authentication header isn't 
disallowed.



src/tests/reservation_endpoints_tests.cpp (line 1192)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/42368/#comment176750>

    Can we call this: `dynamicallyReservedWithNonMatchingPrincipal`? "New 
principal" makes it sound as if we're in the context of trying to update an 
existing principal to a new principal or something.


- Michael Park


On Jan. 20, 2016, 6:59 p.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/42368/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 20, 2016, 6:59 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Jie Yu, Michael Park, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4195
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4195
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added reservation endpoint test without authentication.
> 
> Currently, dynamic reservation endpoints will not work when HTTP 
> authentication is not set. Currently, the authentication code will always 
> return `None()` as the principal when authentication is disabled. 
> Furthermore, the `ReservationInfo.principal` field is being migrated to 
> `optional`, so dynamic reservations without a principal are invalidated by 
> the master. This test checks that these endpoints will fail as expected when 
> HTTP authentication is disabled.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/reservation_endpoints_tests.cpp 
> b8edd6fafedd4c2221a8d19c1ebc71254071a8c7 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42368/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> A new test, `ReservationEndpointsTest.ReserveAndUnreserveNoAuthentication`, 
> was added, and make check was used to test. The new test was also run with 
> `--gtest_repeat=1000 --gtest_break_on_failure=1`.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Greg Mann
> 
>

Reply via email to