> On Jan. 24, 2016, 3:28 p.m., Joerg Schad wrote:
> > include/mesos/mesos.proto, line 482
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/42697/diff/1/?file=1218952#file1218952line482>
> >
> >     We planned to wait for this deprecation cycle, any reason to change 
> > this right now?

I saw
```
// TODO(joerg84): Remove checkpoint field after deprecation cycle starting
-  // with 0.27
```
Do you mean we need submit this since 0.28 here?


- haosdent


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42697/#review116018
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 24, 2016, 3:26 p.m., haosdent huang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/42697/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 24, 2016, 3:26 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B and Joerg Schad.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4340
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4340
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Remove checkpointing field from SlaveInfo after deprecation.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/slave-recovery.md acf36b9693972641f38a96e8d6b682e02b6cdbb3 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto 96b911fb370223933df52f9370897871827d2247 
>   src/common/type_utils.cpp 76f48f6a1f5467db032ded8acd296d03353b4172 
>   src/internal/devolve.cpp 27918f1fc385b1770843697c16a29fd0d376f39d 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp 1f4c8368feb0ce19963577582ce745acfb21aa9f 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42697/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make -j8 check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> haosdent huang
> 
>

Reply via email to