> On Feb. 5, 2016, 2:20 p.m., Qian Zhang wrote: > > 1. Besides changing the code, you may also need to update the following doc > > to describe the newly introduced env var "LIBPROCESS_MAX_WORKER_THREADS" > > https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/docs/configuration.md#libprocess-options > > 2. Have you test the patch with executor from E2E? For example, start Mesos > > agent with "LIBPROCESS_MAX_WORKER_THREADS" in its > > "--executor_environment_variables" option, launch a task, and check if the > > libprocess worker thread number of the related executor is the expected > > number.
1. Done. 2. No. Can someone point me to a simple test to view executor logs? - Maged ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43144/#review118012 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Feb. 5, 2016, 9:46 p.m., Maged Michael wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/43144/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Feb. 5, 2016, 9:46 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Guangya Liu, Klaus Ma, and Qian Zhang. > > > Bugs: MESOS-4353 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4353 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Added env var to set upper bound on number of libprocess worker threads. > > > Diffs > ----- > > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp d8a74d7 > docs/configuration.md 4b5a394 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43144/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Passed make check on x86_64 Ubuntu 14.04. > > Invocations of mesos-master, mesos-slave, and mesos-tests with the > LIBPROCESS_MAX_WORKER_THREADS set to the values "1", "7", "9", "1000", "0", > "-1", and "abc" on a 4-core x86_64 Ubuntu 14.04 system. The results were as > expected. 1, 7, 8, 8, 8, 8, and 8 worker threads were created, respectively. > The last 3 tests generated warnings. > > > Thanks, > > Maged Michael > >
