-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41597/#review119848
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp (lines 1068 - 1070)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/41597/#comment181234>

    Why don't we need to set `rebalance` here?


- Alexander Rukletsov


On Feb. 14, 2016, 11:37 a.m., Yongqiao Wang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/41597/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 14, 2016, 11:37 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Neil Conway, and Qian Zhang.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3943
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3943
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Extending allocator interface to support dynamic weights.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/master/allocator.hpp e163669c9c4e4c98572968f18987704b60722a79 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto 0bd5abadb5abe052161963ca995c396f1ed832f2 
>   include/mesos/v1/mesos.proto 38e04cb19e303d1c71d2afad6ea73137aaa7403a 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/allocator.hpp 
> 581eaad376e7b2febe0b6359014617b935a677a3 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp 
> 20d7ceb1a75ea5cb9efb1fc7fb085265b32864fe 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp 
> a9d2c23162892e22220f97d89a076d2311091d91 
>   src/master/allocator/sorter/drf/sorter.hpp 
> 4669149b81de39b4bb921ef7cd6787aa583f6e40 
>   src/master/allocator/sorter/drf/sorter.cpp 
> 18797e42a9c2bd20392020237cfae600a5ffe12c 
>   src/master/allocator/sorter/sorter.hpp 
> a0a779b81f6d048271f15256b38ff907ae144b83 
>   src/tests/allocator.hpp 206e9ac3a83038a691f7929bdd627042b0f363b0 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41597/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Make & Make check successfully!
> 
> Test case: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41672/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Yongqiao Wang
> 
>

Reply via email to