----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43914/#review121484 -----------------------------------------------------------
src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/net_cls.cpp (lines 125 - 129) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/43914/#comment183199> Can you use a nested for loop here? We might want to support non-contiguous secondaries in the future, let's write some code that's future proof. src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/net_cls.cpp (lines 166 - 169) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/43914/#comment183200> Ditto on using a nested for loop - Jie Yu On March 1, 2016, 7:58 p.m., Avinash sridharan wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/43914/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 1, 2016, 7:58 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos and Jie Yu. > > > Bugs: MESOS-4700 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4700 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > The `alloc`, `free` and `reserve` methods of `NetClsHandleManager` can > now work with a specified range of secondary handles instead of > assuming that the entire 64K space of secondary handles is available > for use. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/net_cls.hpp > acd61e615951e18dd51a2ce1e746ba733e9159ae > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/net_cls.cpp > f05cd55a9e080f44566ec7dcef22f11950496d6f > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43914/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make and make check. > > Also ran sudo make check for the "NetClsIsolatoTest" > > > Thanks, > > Avinash sridharan > >
