> On Feb. 26, 2016, 1:45 a.m., Anand Mazumdar wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/process_tests.cpp, lines 1764-1776
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/44026/diff/1/?file=1271139#file1271139line1764>
> >
> >     Should this be moved to `future_tests.cpp` too?
> 
> Cong Wang wrote:
>     Yes, it should, because this is a pure Future test, not related to 
> process.

Sorry, I missed this response. Why was the issue dropped when you _agreed_ that 
this test needs to be moved too?


- Anand


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/44026/#review120813
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 9, 2016, 7:01 p.m., Cong Wang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/44026/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 9, 2016, 7:01 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Michael Park, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Moved future tests into future_tests.cpp.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/future_tests.cpp 
> ded1aaed25876d45e33b4a27fffc6a5c46ca92f5 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/process_tests.cpp 
> e9bf80ee69f4add299cb828ed3245ac07398943c 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44026/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Cong Wang
> 
>

Reply via email to