-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/44258/#review123064
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Joris Van Remoortere


On March 9, 2016, 5:38 a.m., Guangya Liu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/44258/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 9, 2016, 5:38 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar, Joris Van Remoortere, and Joseph Wu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4831
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4831
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> There is a bug when setting host maintain with http endpoint: 
> https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/src/master/http.cpp#L1987-L2021
> The logic is as this:
> 1) Get all host list from maintain window and put it to updated hashmap.
> 2) If the machine in was in updated was also in master->machines, call master 
> updateUnavailability to trigger recoverResources, updateUnavailability etc in 
> allocator
> 3) Otherwise, clear the unavailabity time window for the machine.
> 4) Update each new machines in updated to call master updateUnavailability
> 
> But the logic in step 4) is getting all machines from the schedule windows 
> but not the machines that is new to the cluster, this caused master get two 
> updateUnavailability calls for a machine in the updated hashmap.
> 
> The fix is filter machines in updated hashmap when handling new machines.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/http.cpp a3ad57a1c3f8a01aa609b28c12825670bb243387 
>   src/tests/master_maintenance_tests.cpp 
> 3faa8136cf57276295553910319480028f433e4c 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44258/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make
> make check
>  ./bin/mesos-tests.sh --gtest_filter="MasterMaintenanceTest.*" --verbose
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Guangya Liu
> 
>

Reply via email to