-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/44690/#review123076
-----------------------------------------------------------




3rdparty/libprocess/src/help.cpp (lines 97 - 100)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/44690/#comment185212>

    Can you add a comment here about why the delegate logic is here? Also, not 
yours, but the getUsagePath helper is pretty confusing, would be ideal to dig 
into that further as I'm a bit confused about when slashes need to be stripped 
from the end. Looks like help is broken for /version, for example. :(



3rdparty/libprocess/src/help.cpp (line 98)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/44690/#comment185197>

    2 spaces here



3rdparty/libprocess/src/help.cpp (line 100)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/44690/#comment185198>

    extra space here?


- Ben Mahler


On March 11, 2016, 1:38 a.m., Kevin Klues wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/44690/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 11, 2016, 1:38 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Neil Conway.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4787
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4787
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Just as the ProcessManager needs the delegate name to know which
> process to service root HTTP requests from, the Help process needs to
> know the delegate name so it can generate the proper USAGE strings.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/help.hpp 
> 93306adfd64cc08933232e0db78d9efacb966018 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/help.cpp bac980ddec98b34bdfd786b03d0691fefb93f45a 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp 
> 01bc19bc6f4d78923bb3796b7dd0a9ab2b3108d1 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44690/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I spun up a master and an agent and looked at their /help endpoint to verify 
> that the updated USAGE strings include information about accessing the 
> enpoint without the process name.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kevin Klues
> 
>

Reply via email to