> On March 13, 2016, 6:47 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> > support/clang-format, line 2
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/44758/diff/1/?file=1296800#file1296800line2>
> >
> >     It would be great if you could use this opportunity and explicitly 
> > expand the values of the `Google` style we do rely on. This avoids the 
> > problem of upstream changing their definition of `Google` style, and then 
> > users on our end using different styles, depending on their clang version. 
> > This was an issue in the past with clang-format from trunk.
> >     
> >     You should use `clang-format -dump-config` with some 3.5 and 3.8 
> > versions and adjust values where needed. As a starting point, I am using 
> > this config with clang-format from trunk (but cannot vouch for its quality),
> >     
> >       https://gist.github.com/bbannier/6e47d32eec9e0093711a

Thanks for the feedback Benjamin. I updated the clang-format file based on the 
Google style value expansion in 3.8. Please let me know if there are any other 
issues.


- Yong


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/44758/#review123323
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 14, 2016, 1:09 a.m., Yong Tang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/44758/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 14, 2016, 1:09 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Michael Park.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4906
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4906
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Upgrade to clang-format-3.8 (MESOS-4906).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/clang-format.md 7f1c1dfd70e1fe9bfa186df1bdda7bdcf867db04 
>   support/clang-format 499d0e749e14e50256ae649afa0ced2b04589a0e 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44758/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Yong Tang
> 
>

Reply via email to