-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/44790/#review125510
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!





src/linux/systemd.cpp (lines 73 - 74)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/44790/#comment188328>

    let's add a `NOTE` here explaining that returning an error implies the 
child will be killed.
    I know you added this to the header, but it's great to have it with the 
implementation.



src/linux/systemd.cpp (line 81)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/44790/#comment188327>

    `is not configured as enabled`


- Joris Van Remoortere


On March 14, 2016, 3:44 p.m., Joerg Schad wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/44790/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 14, 2016, 3:44 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Joris Van Remoortere.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4839
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4839
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Previously the Error behavior (in particular where the child process is 
> killed) was not consistent among Error cases.
> We should establish the convention that the Hook itself returns an error, 
> while the subprocess code is resposible for
> killing the child process in case of such Error.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/linux/systemd.hpp 6b240b9cc2fe559d111a4235e70f00e07f3d4495 
>   src/linux/systemd.cpp e120d2ceffe6bb400859f2a132f02a99f561f856 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44790/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> sudo make check (on Linux)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joerg Schad
> 
>

Reply via email to