> On March 18, 2016, 7:27 p.m., Michael Park wrote: > > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os.hpp, line 118 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/44081/diff/1/?file=1298167#file1298167line118> > > > > This is not necessarily `LD_LIBRARY_PATH` anymore, right? Here and > > below. > > Alex Clemmer wrote: > That's right, but the only platform that's not true on is Windows, where > this functionality is not really available. Since we have no chance to > generalize it to the Windows case, my inclination is to keep it as is.
Sounds good. - Michael ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44081/#review124257 ----------------------------------------------------------- On March 31, 2016, 5:15 p.m., Alex Clemmer wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/44081/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 31, 2016, 5:15 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Alex Naparu, Daniel Pravat, Artem Harutyunyan, > Joris Van Remoortere, Michael Park, M Lawindi, and Yi Sun. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Stout: Moved `os::libraries::` namespace back to `stout/os.hpp`. > > > Diffs > ----- > > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os.hpp > 79e30ca04c6d23f92e3a2f80fbe38ae63fde3520 > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/posix/os.hpp > 9ee233b988c08d953e70345c55bcdd5c2f7c101b > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44081/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Alex Clemmer > >
