-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45342/#review129450
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/authorizer/local/authorizer.cpp (line 204)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/45342/#comment192864>

    We generally avoid 'default' cases in enum switches because they allow the 
code to compile when a new enum value is introduced.
    
    If you use a 'case UNKNOWN' instead, this will handle the unknown types and 
will prevent the code from compiling when a new enum value is introduced but 
not handled.
    
    Make sense?
    
    Ditto for the recent executor.proto and scheduler.proto changes.


- Ben Mahler


On March 29, 2016, 2:04 a.m., Yong Tang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/45342/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 29, 2016, 2:04 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Anand Mazumdar, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-5031
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5031
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This fix tries to make the Action enum in Authorization optional
> to support upgrades. See MESOS-4997 for details.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/authorizer/authorizer.proto 
> 944a493e0979c7ffbd99f3a67785a10425fd9040 
>   src/authorizer/local/authorizer.cpp 
> 0f0d9276337858984f0b19a82ffca74ee84dc650 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45342/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check (Ubuntu 14.04)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Yong Tang
> 
>

Reply via email to