> On April 20, 2016, 10:35 a.m., Adam B wrote:
> > src/slave/http.cpp, lines 658-660
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46203/diff/9/?file=1350392#file1350392line658>
> >
> >     Where did you come up with the magic number 3? What if we reorganize 
> > the operator endpoints in the (1.0) future? How will we know what the new 
> > value should be here?
> >     What if the user setup a reverse proxy (like in dcos) and these 
> > requests are actually coming from a different base url than expected?
> 
> Benjamin Bannier wrote:
>     @adam: The three here is needed so that this just strips the agent part 
> of the path, not everything up to the last `/`. An example endpoint would be 
> `/slave(1)/monitor/statistics`.
> 
> Jan Schlicht wrote:
>     Seems like a hard problem to fully support both requirements. Maybe 
> reverting back to using `std::string` instead of `http::URL` as the function 
> parameter for `endpoint` could resolve this.
> 
> Benjamin Bannier wrote:
>     Please use some typed entity that the usual endpoint handlers are aware 
> of. They currently have a `Request`, but e.g., have no idea how they are 
> being routed.
> 
> Jan Schlicht wrote:
>     I'll go back to using the "magic number 3". At this point `URL::path` 
> will look like this: "/slave(n)/name/of/endpoint". By splitting into 3 
> components we get rid of the "/slave(n)/". The path is not the full URL that 
> has been requested, hence reverse proxies shouldn't be an issue here. I'll 
> add a comment, explaining this.
> 
> Adam B wrote:
>     I see. And will this value be the same for the master's endpoints?
>     Good to hear that reverse proxies won't be affected since it's not a full 
> URL.

This values won't work for the master's endpoint. In that case `URL::path` will 
be "/name/of/endpoint" and we wouldn't need to split. Because we're in 
`Slave::Http` we can expect that this code is only called for agents.


- Jan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46203/#review129696
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 25, 2016, 10:30 a.m., Jan Schlicht wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/46203/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 25, 2016, 10:30 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Alexander Rojas, and Benjamin Bannier.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-5142
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5142
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/configuration.md 86ba66ac62295ca148524bcb2e57fee560ac4ac5 
>   include/mesos/authorizer/acls.proto 
> c50deeb5565dfd5b3e5e7210283d9a36a3bfd579 
>   include/mesos/authorizer/authorizer.proto 
> 40d93ea257d1df8d22eee8a21667db90d579a8fe 
>   src/Makefile.am e024c6d65608a55765e527a8668c415723dcfcca 
>   src/authorizer/local/authorizer.cpp 
> 0a3805fe4ce8eb89e096e8cd4326035513ba892b 
>   src/slave/flags.cpp 10d2974bd2b6e79255fc894979607f0d2d00c315 
>   src/slave/http.cpp 537736d1fe42e8150bad91326299ef9a17041a8e 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp 20a4bcd0bb9dad06ea81fc4ad9b2fa462c69d2c5 
>   src/tests/slave_authorization_tests.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46203/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jan Schlicht
> 
>

Reply via email to