> On 五月 2, 2016, 9:44 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/tests/containerizer/docker_volume_isolator_tests.cpp, lines 172-181
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46140/diff/2/?file=1363610#file1363610line172>
> >
> >     Why copy the code here? I don't think we need a 'rootfs' to test some 
> > basic functionalities.
> >     
> >     Let's not test the rootfs path yet.

Here I want to test about two kind of different cases: With rootfs and without 
rootfs, can you please show more detail why do you think that we do not need to 
test the rootfs path now?


> On 五月 2, 2016, 9:44 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/tests/containerizer/docker_volume_isolator_tests.cpp, lines 269-271
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46140/diff/2/?file=1363610#file1363610line269>
> >
> >     Hum, please do not blindly copy the comments. Does it apply here??

Sorry, I have fixed this in a non publihsed patch.


> On 五月 2, 2016, 9:44 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/tests/containerizer/docker_volume_isolator_tests.cpp, line 94
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46140/diff/2/?file=1363610#file1363610line94>
> >
> >     Why do you need the additional `_dvdcli` parameter? Is it used?

Because the constructor of `DriverClient` need this parameter and the 
`MockDockerVolumeDriverClient` is derived from that class.


> On 五月 2, 2016, 9:44 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/docker/volume/driver.hpp, line 72
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46140/diff/2/?file=1363609#file1363609line72>
> >
> >     I don't think you need this change. See my comments below.

Since I need to make the class `MockDockerVolumeDriverClient` derived from 
`DriverClient`, so here need to udpate it to `protected`. I was following the 
`docker` test style here: 
https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/src/docker/docker.hpp#L171-L173
https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/src/tests/mesos.cpp#L606-L610


> On 五月 2, 2016, 9:44 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/tests/containerizer/docker_volume_isolator_tests.cpp, lines 113-124
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46140/diff/2/?file=1363610#file1363610line113>
> >
> >     This is not needed. Let's make it a pure mock object.

The `mount` will failed if I did not create the `mountPoint` in this mock 
method as the `bind mount` need a real path mount to the container.


> On 五月 2, 2016, 9:44 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/tests/containerizer/docker_volume_isolator_tests.cpp, line 91
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46140/diff/2/?file=1363610#file1363610line91>
> >
> >     I would call it:
> >     ```
> >     MockDockerVolumeDriverClient
> >     ```
> >     
> >     Let's make it a pure Mock without a concrete implementation. You can 
> > setup Mock expectation in the following tests.

I saw that my test cases are very similar with docker test, so I was following 
the style of docker here, 

https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/src/tests/mesos.cpp#L606-L626
https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/src/tests/mesos.hpp#L1498-L1527


- Guangya


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46140/#review131378
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 四月 27, 2016, 4:28 p.m., Guangya Liu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/46140/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 四月 27, 2016, 4:28 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gilbert Song and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-5266
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5266
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> WIP: Added dvd isolator test "ROOT_LaunchCommandExecutorWithVolumes".
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/Makefile.am e024c6d65608a55765e527a8668c415723dcfcca 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/docker/volume/driver.hpp 
> 070d52018e82ed3e46fb1b79714ffc4716f6a306 
>   src/tests/containerizer/docker_volume_isolator_tests.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46140/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Guangya Liu
> 
>

Reply via email to