> On 五月 26, 2016, 10:30 a.m., Adam B wrote:
> > src/master/weights_handler.cpp, line 85
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/47805/diff/1/?file=1392984#file1392984line85>
> >
> >     s/=/request, weightInfos/
> >     s/list<bool>/list<bool>&/

Adam, this function also requires to capture 'this', which will be used in the 
invocation of '_get()', can we keep using '=' here?


> On 五月 26, 2016, 10:30 a.m., Adam B wrote:
> > src/tests/dynamic_weights_tests.cpp, lines 492-494
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/47805/diff/1/?file=1392985#file1392985line492>
> >
> >     Seems like `checkWithGetRequest` should take the credential as a 
> > parameter, rather than hiding that credential-selection logic inside the 
> > check method.

as in checkWithGetRequest, we are using the constant strings to identify the 
result of get weights, so for 'get weights' specific test cases, I suggest keep 
these two new constant strings. I will add a new credential parameter to 
checkWithGetRequest method and remove the credential-selection logic in it.


> On 五月 26, 2016, 10:30 a.m., Adam B wrote:
> > src/tests/dynamic_weights_tests.cpp, line 512
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/47805/diff/1/?file=1392985#file1392985line512>
> >
> >     Since this test already uses a principal, why not only allow that 
> > principal to get the weights?
> >     Then you can also test that a get request without a principal (or with 
> > CREDENTIAL_2) will see no roles.

Adam, yes, I will only allow DEFAULT_CREDENTIAL in these test cases, but for 
the get check, as I already added a new test case to test "get weights with 
role" only, I suggest not to add a new get request test in this test case. Or 
we can merge the get weights test and update weights test together into one, 
please let me know your comments, thanks.


- zhou


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47805/#review134954
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 五月 27, 2016, 5:45 a.m., zhou xing wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/47805/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 五月 27, 2016, 5:45 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Adam B.
> 
> 
> Bugs: mesos-5335
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/mesos-5335
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add 'GET_WEIGHTS_WITH_ROLE' for the authorization of GET /weights.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/endpoints/master/weights.md 1e540795c5fb90c8ea957dd444b9e564e0b1ac23 
>   include/mesos/authorizer/acls.proto 
> ace9b698f46e1437911115c82324a87a0d7827fb 
>   include/mesos/authorizer/authorizer.proto 
> 02d1a01d57cf34b38524f4368187878b03343537 
>   src/authorizer/local/authorizer.cpp 
> 3c7c791bde65cfcbcc4e319c9ccc487ab37d8029 
>   src/master/http.cpp b36b439a1fa07c52146deff2b90728f92676ade3 
>   src/master/master.hpp 1a875c32eddfb6d884e3d0dda7f5716ee53966c3 
>   src/master/weights_handler.cpp 4bc060fdb015df6658194eef92fe11b14aa15c79 
>   src/tests/dynamic_weights_tests.cpp 
> 362c59aae7b305710d5985bfec28f881be3b64b8 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/47805/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> zhou xing
> 
>

Reply via email to