----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46887/#review137495 -----------------------------------------------------------
docs/authorization.md (line 140) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46887/#comment202632> Could we a) check that the HTTP HELP text is correct for all these endpoints (i.e, mentions AUTHORIZATION) b) mention here that the HTTP endpoint HELP contains information about this? s/supports/covers (as it does not allow individual endpoints, it is a all or nothing decision) docs/authorization.md (line 601) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46887/#comment202636> .. endpoints (due to the `permissive = false`). docs/upgrades.md (line 75) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46887/#comment202637> can you double check that label is still available (I believe I saw/wrote another patch using that label). docs/upgrades.md (line 217) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46887/#comment202638> enables required authorization for the following endpoint. docs/upgrades.md (line 224) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46887/#comment202639> Add something along the lines: Be careful when using this together with ACLs and permissive = false. - Joerg Schad On June 14, 2016, 11:46 a.m., Jan Schlicht wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/46887/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated June 14, 2016, 11:46 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Alexander Rojas, Joerg Schad, and Till Toenshoff. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Added the HTTP GET authorization action to the documentation. > > > Diffs > ----- > > CHANGELOG 0df0d4ccd76379ede6492e595999711e5462f79b > docs/authorization.md dcf2160424771c513579063911cc14792f464821 > docs/upgrades.md afc76f7a0e74042bd095b925f8119bfa5daa489c > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46887/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Jan Schlicht > >
