-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/49155/#review139274
-----------------------------------------------------------




include/mesos/master/master.proto (line 279)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/49155/#comment204441>

    I think we should unified messages for different `Get*` calls in the V1 API.
    
    IMO, the current json based endpoints are a bit difficult and confusing to 
use, because all of them have slight different return values even if returning 
same logical object like Framework or Task. And there is little reason they 
should differ.
    
    Also, given that we are introducing a new versioned API, we don't really 
need to guarantee byte level compatibility of existing unversioned endpoints. 
Functional equivalency should be sufficent.
    
    Can you take a look at new messages defined at 
https://reviews.apache.org/r/48751/ and comment on what additions or changes we 
need for them?


- Zhitao Li


On June 23, 2016, 3:15 p.m., Jay Guo wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/49155/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 23, 2016, 3:15 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar, zhou xing, haosdent huang, Vinod 
> Kone, and Zhitao Li.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-5490
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5490
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Implement GET_STATE_SUMMARY Call in v1 master API.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/master/master.proto 639fbd110df4aca1cf700cb9e455eecc110a7f66 
>   include/mesos/v1/master/master.proto 
> 11dfab318eb073908a9e302afa33b274fec63a16 
>   src/master/http.cpp 70f084b84db90fde20c05d2354be190f28e72996 
>   src/master/master.hpp e983d1ba6ebcdaf2ace419201659e53edaa2a0aa 
>   src/tests/api_tests.cpp 7f16f43c3968cd56cf93951489079032093beaeb 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/49155/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> WIP
> 
> make check on Ubuntu 14.04
> 
> It would be good to have common proto message `agent` and `framework`, since 
> they are being used in API `get_state`, `get_agent`, `get_framework`, even 
> though not entirely identical.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jay Guo
> 
>

Reply via email to