-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43471/#review141582
-----------------------------------------------------------



Closing this review due to inactivity. Please see our 
[guidelines](https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/docs/reopening-reviews.md)
 for reopening reviews.

- Joris Van Remoortere


On April 10, 2016, 10:53 a.m., haosdent huang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/43471/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 10, 2016, 10:53 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov and Benjamin Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4648
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4648
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Currently zookeeper multi-threaded c client doesn't wake up the IO
> thread after enqueue auth info message. So the auth info message isn't
> flushed util poll timeout. We back port this patch from ZOOKEEPER-770
> to wake up the IO thread in send_info_packet() just as send_ping()
> does.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/zookeeper-06d3f3f.patch 56480d5f42b65b5b75e40e5e44666f1db3cf2423 
>   3rdparty/zookeeper-3.4.8.patch 486df1ae96af3426835c9d47ff2e36dd47ccde3f 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43471/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Before
> 
> ```
> [       OK ] ZooKeeperMasterContenderDetectorTest.NonRetryableFrrors (10053 
> ms)
> [       OK ] MasterZooKeeperTest.MasterInfoAddress (11282 ms)
> [       OK ] ZooKeeperTest.Auth (6688 ms)
> [       OK ] ZooKeeperTest.Create (6690 ms)
> ```
> 
> After
> 
> ```
> [       OK ] ZooKeeperMasterContenderDetectorTest.NonRetryableFrrors (321 ms)
> [       OK ] MasterZooKeeperTest.MasterInfoAddress (447 ms)
> [       OK ] ZooKeeperTest.Auth (233 ms)
> [       OK ] ZooKeeperTest.Create (275 ms)
> ```
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> haosdent huang
> 
>

Reply via email to