----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/50422/#review143910 -----------------------------------------------------------
src/tests/slave_tests.cpp (line 2564) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/50422/#comment209870> Fair enough -- we do resume the clock unnecessarily in a lot of tests, so I was following that pattern for consistency. It would be good to go through and remove the unnecessary `resume`s from all tests. - Neil Conway On July 28, 2016, 10:14 a.m., Neil Conway wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/50422/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 28, 2016, 10:14 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > These tests relied on the implementation detail that when an agent is > removed from the list of registered agents, the master sends a > ShutdownSlaveMessage to the agent. That will change in the future > (MESOS-4049). To prepare for this future planned behavior, adjust these > tests to be more robust by instead checking for the invocation of the > `slaveLost` scheduler callback. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/tests/slave_tests.cpp b9fa85dc1ae0922a100786fcb01156b90a013d2a > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/50422/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > Validated that when the "cancel pending slave removal on receipt of ping" > code is removed, `CancelSlaveRemoval` still fails. > > > Thanks, > > Neil Conway > >
