-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/51163/#review145957
-----------------------------------------------------------



Bad patch!

Reviews applied: [51163, 51162, 51161, 51141]

Failed command: ./support/apply-review.sh -n -r 51163

Error:
2016-08-17 05:19:38 URL:https://reviews.apache.org/r/51163/diff/raw/ 
[25337/25337] -> "51163.patch" [1]
error: patch failed: src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp:812
error: src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp: patch does not apply

Full log: https://builds.apache.org/job/mesos-reviewbot/14833/console

- Mesos ReviewBot


On Aug. 17, 2016, 12:07 a.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/51163/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 17, 2016, 12:07 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Gilbert Song, Kevin Klues, and 
> Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch simplified the MesosContainerizer logic by introducing
> `ContainerConfig` in `Container` struct. This avoids some parameter
> passing in the launch path. To prepare for the nested container
> support, this patch introduces a private `launch` method which takes a
> `ContainerConfig` (instead of ExecutorInfo and TaskInfo) since nested
> container might not tie to a task.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/slave/isolator.proto e945514fbdd49b3b35e200a7fc2e1cd446c1af91 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.hpp 
> 499396121de4e9e654f78f73493e76053fb83d42 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp 
> 77a502f853e3e04ea8e274419544601778be9421 
>   src/tests/containerizer/mesos_containerizer_tests.cpp 
> 4a49247a8b8c6995535a865266f85f2aa31fb4de 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51163/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jie Yu
> 
>

Reply via email to