-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50751/#review145966
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/tests/containerizer/isolator_tests.cpp (line 1235)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/50751/#comment212322>

    Why renaming this test from `ROOT_CGROUPS_PERF_Sample` to 
`ROOT_CGROUPS_PERF_PerfEventSample`? Can we just keep the original test name 
`ROOT_CGROUPS_PERF_Sample`? And then in `src/tests/environment.cpp`, I think 
you only need to remove the duplicated `matches(test, 
"ROOT_CGROUPS_PERF_Sample")`.


- Qian Zhang


On Aug. 17, 2016, 1:47 a.m., haosdent huang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/50751/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 17, 2016, 1:47 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gilbert Song, Jie Yu, Qian Zhang, and Zhengju Sha.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-5975
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5975
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Removed CgroupsPerfEventIsolatorProcess.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/CMakeLists.txt 4362d472707193aa09343ef69f070e2d3efda324 
>   src/Makefile.am d389e02584cfb1a00067cd30de1364118d1c46c7 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp 
> 5ed894d18258f6516866a2acd343c03281039c3c 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/perf_event.hpp 
> 4abde12af68a26b94b3706cdb38bf9890d811039 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/perf_event.cpp 
> 31f35385691681ef5da14be747edfb5f57c5d05a 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/subsystems/perf_event.cpp 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/tests/containerizer/isolator_tests.cpp 
> f917db78157f799efc00b0c7af0230ddb6f26b0b 
>   src/tests/environment.cpp 7f144f1763320aef1657a60b293d585b74a83367 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/50751/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> haosdent huang
> 
>

Reply via email to