-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/51393/#review146839
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!





src/tests/containerizer/provisioner_paths_tests.cpp (lines 90 - 94)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/51393/#comment213571>

    I would add some comments about the id:
    ```
    ContainerID child1;  // parent1/child1
    ContainerID child2;  // parent1/child2
    ContainerID child3;  // parent2/child3
    ContainerID parent1; // parent1
    ContainerID parent2; // parent2
    ```
    
    Adjust below accordingly.



src/tests/containerizer/provisioner_paths_tests.cpp (lines 109 - 114)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/51393/#comment213572>

    ```
    ASSERT_SOME(os::mdir(containerDir1));
    ```
    
    No need for the temp variable.


- Jie Yu


On Aug. 24, 2016, 9:32 p.m., Gilbert Song wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/51393/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 24, 2016, 9:32 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Artem Harutyunyan, Jie Yu, and 
> Kevin Klues.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6067
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6067
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added unit test for provisioner recursive listContainers().
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/containerizer/provisioner_paths_tests.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51393/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gilbert Song
> 
>

Reply via email to