-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/51953/#review149232
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!





src/master/master.hpp (line 2136)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/51953/#comment216795>

    s/registered/admitted/



src/master/master.cpp (line 7376)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/51953/#comment216796>

    s/registered/admitted/


- Vinod Kone


On Sept. 16, 2016, 12:58 p.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/51953/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 16, 2016, 12:58 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-5951
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5951
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Registrar operations to admit and remove slaves now behave the same way,
> regardless of the value of the "strict" flag.
> 
> This commit changes the behavior of these operations by enabling the
> previous "strict" behavior. For example, removing a slave that is not
> registered results in an `Error`, rather than silently ignoring the
> problem. However, the master should never attempt to remove a slave that
> is not registered, so this is a useful invariant to check. Similarly,
> attempting to admit a slave that is already admitted will now result in
> an `Error`; this should only occur when there is a slave ID collision,
> so again it seems appropriate to produce an error rather than ignoring
> the problem.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.hpp 4992ab0a0bb5babbf6a4fa3e6eff3577590fc879 
>   src/master/master.cpp b88472f6350d3f71e057bab34822423da5427151 
>   src/tests/registrar_tests.cpp b04fc92c66449f1094212a534899e16d5f6f01bd 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51953/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check` on OSX and Linux.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Neil Conway
> 
>

Reply via email to