----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52144/#review150140 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! Would be nice to update an existing test to check for the presence of timestamp in an executor generated update. - Vinod Kone On Sept. 22, 2016, 7:15 p.m., Anand Mazumdar wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/52144/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 22, 2016, 7:15 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > The command executor/default executor were not populating > the timestamp for the status update. Previously, the executor > driver used to do it underneath but that won't work with using > the HTTP command executor. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/launcher/default_executor.cpp 2102fe8d70f0960fed669e1c4f0d6b6cd4af261c > src/launcher/executor.cpp 5370634ef9e6f3ac9717fed71f6a77707026a16a > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52144/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Anand Mazumdar > >
