-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/52149/#review150316
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/launcher/default_executor.cpp (line 132)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/52149/#comment218250>

    don't you want to check `if (!killed)`?



src/launcher/default_executor.cpp (line 427)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/52149/#comment218251>

    just inline this function.



src/launcher/default_executor.cpp (line 482)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/52149/#comment218252>

    log a statement here.



src/launcher/default_executor.cpp (line 501)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/52149/#comment218253>

    Log here?



src/launcher/default_executor.cpp (line 753)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/52149/#comment218254>

    log a statement here.



src/launcher/default_executor.cpp (lines 762 - 775)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/52149/#comment218255>

    I think it is worth logging insided onFailed and onDiscarded handlers 
before firing a delay.


- Vinod Kone


On Sept. 23, 2016, 3:28 a.m., Anand Mazumdar wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/52149/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 23, 2016, 3:28 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6227
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6227
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This change adds support for waiting on child containers via the
> `WAIT_NESTED_CONTAINER` call on the Agent API. If the connection
> fails due to a temporary network blip, it reconnects with the
> agent.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/launcher/default_executor.cpp 2102fe8d70f0960fed669e1c4f0d6b6cd4af261c 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52149/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anand Mazumdar
> 
>

Reply via email to