> On 九月 22, 2016, 10:14 p.m., Guangya Liu wrote:
> > src/common/resources.cpp, line 677
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/51999/diff/3/?file=1506811#file1506811line677>
> >
> >     I think that we should still use 
> > `internal::validateCommandLineResources` as the command line resources 
> > should not have dynamic resevations etc.
> >     
> >     But there is a bug in `internal::validateCommandLineResources` now, as 
> > when I set a resource string as `cpus:45.55;ports:[10000-20000, 
> > 30000-50000];disks:{-xx}`, there will be no erros if using 
> > `internal::validateCommandLineResources` to validate.
> >     
> >     So I would suggest the following:
> >     1) Continue use `internal::validateCommandLineResources` to validate 
> > resource.
> >     2) Add `role` validation in `internal::validateCommandLineResources`.
> 
> Anindya Sinha wrote:
>     I am not sure I understand your concern. In `fromJsonString()` [actually 
> `convertJson()`] and `fromSimpleString()`, we call `Resources::validate()` to 
> validate each of the `Resource` objects (which captures negative valued 
> resource, etc. as an Error). In addition, we call 
> `internal::validateCommandLineResources` from `Resources::parse()` after 
> getting the `vector<Resource>` from `fromJsonString()` and 
> `fromSimpleString()` to validate again the resource containing persistent 
> volume, dynamic reservation, etc. So, I think we are covered on your case.
>     
>     Secondly, can you please explain what you mean by 'role' validation from 
> point # 2 above.

1) I think we cannot call `Resources::validate()` in `fromSimpleString()`, as 
the input is from flags text and we cannot specify reservation etc, so we need 
to make sure there is no reservation etc after `fromSimpleString()`. But in 
`fromSimpleString()`, you are actually calling `Resources::validate()` which 
will think that having reservation etc is also valid, that's why I propose call 
`internal::validateCommandLineResources` instead. 

2) Another point I want to mention is when calling `fromSimpleString()` and 
using `internal::validateCommandLineResources`, we should also validate `roles` 
as here we are also setting roles for the resource object, so we also need to 
add role validation logic, otherwise, there will be no error when parsing 
`cpus:45.55;disks:{-xx}`, (NOTE: `disks:{-xx}` is not valid)


- Guangya


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/51999/#review150081
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 九月 26, 2016, 8:58 p.m., Anindya Sinha wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/51999/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 九月 26, 2016, 8:58 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Jiang Yan Xu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6062
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6062
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Refactored `Resources::parse()` into 2 separate static functions:
> 1. Resources::fromJSONString() to parse JSON representation of
>    resources.
> 2. Resources::fromSimpleString() to parse text representation of
>    resources.
> 
> Since these 2 new functions return a `Try<vector<Resource>>`, the
> existing `Resources::parse()` implicitly converts that to a
> `Resources` object. This refactor is done to retrieve all resources
> (include empty resources) required for auto detection of root
> and MOUNT disks.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/resources.hpp 3ef8cacee529addc745b4aeb6398d7606c61b749 
>   include/mesos/v1/resources.hpp ef56b4960b103a3efd916fab64796aa334ba44c6 
>   src/common/resources.cpp 0774ff0669e831494d5b12b88e19dfa0a4a3f757 
>   src/tests/resources_tests.cpp 3e493007d6d1d8194d07035aaa1cde28dedf2b5a 
>   src/v1/resources.cpp 62a644ebbd13cfc0862bd118ba16c43e0f6aaf90 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51999/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> All tests passed.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anindya Sinha
> 
>

Reply via email to