----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53435/#review154925 -----------------------------------------------------------
src/tests/containerizer/docker_volume_isolator_tests.cpp (lines 33 - 34) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/53435/#comment224712> That's what I understood, but I made an error in my comment: in that ordering it should be at the same level as `runtime.hpp` since both of these a 6 levels deep. Currently `linux.hpp` is preceeded by headers 7 levels deep. I seems this ruleis rather complicated in pratice. - Benjamin Bannier On Nov. 4, 2016, 4:15 p.m., Neil Conway wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/53435/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 4, 2016, 4:15 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier and Joseph Wu. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Fixed header include order. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/tests/containerizer/docker_volume_isolator_tests.cpp > ca7bffd3b1773a11a4679d114885d3edd977b02b > src/tests/containerizer/mesos_containerizer_tests.cpp > 4df537747d84daa68c29e2d05b22fa386a4a16db > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53435/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > `make check` > > > Thanks, > > Neil Conway > >
