-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/53688/#review157703
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/namespaces/ipc.hpp (line 28)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/53688/#comment228325>

    Any reason why we are not inhertiting it from a `MesosIsolatorProcess` ? I 
see that given its current implementation it doesn't need to be an actor. But 
might make sense to follow the idiom set by other isolators to keep it Future 
proof?


- Avinash sridharan


On Dec. 1, 2016, 12:24 a.m., James Peach wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/53688/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 1, 2016, 12:24 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Avinash Gautam and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6557
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6557
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Implement a namespace/ipc isolator.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/CMakeLists.txt ea6e399c40d3b2cda195091dc7e74230ff3f68fd 
>   src/Makefile.am 7750ed756d60aa61225667c129df35c6ec70f239 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp 
> 7dde6fc7c20ecd3543891e7d33230d0eaf9460a2 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/namespaces/ipc.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/namespaces/ipc.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/tests/containerizer/isolator_tests.cpp 
> da4627846730abd3a817c3d538ff5676c3c1ef45 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53688/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Make check on Fedora 24.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> James Peach
> 
>

Reply via email to