-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/54796/#review159456
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Benjamin Hindman


On Dec. 15, 2016, 10:02 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/54796/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 15, 2016, 10:02 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Benjamin Hindman.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The way process' `Loop` abstraction is used ensures that `Loop`
> instances life long enough that outstanding continuations are not
> working with destructed data. This is done by capturing
> lifetime-extending handles by value into any continuation.
> 
> Nevertheless, even though continuations always have access to save
> handles (captured via `self`), the code was still accessing `Loop`
> members via explicitly captured `this` pointers. This appears
> needlessly alarming since safe access would always be possible via
> `self`.
> 
> This change replaces access to `Loop` data via potentially (but
> currently not actually) unsafe `this` pointers with access via the
> safe `self`.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/loop.hpp 
> ac54b631be5016ea7bc42b724a5883360718f0f2 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/54796/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> * `make check` (Mac OS 10.12, clang-trunk, w/ optimizations, SSL)
> * `make check` (Fedora 25, clang-3.8, w/optimizations, SSL)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Bannier
> 
>

Reply via email to