> On Jan. 7, 2017, 6:42 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > 3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/linux.hpp, line 72
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/54996/diff/4/?file=1596764#file1596764line72>
> >
> >     Please use errno error so that errno are in the error string.
> >     
> >     `return ErrnoError("Memory allocation failed");`

`posix_memalign` never sets `errno`. Shouldn't we just return `Error`?


- Aaron


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/54996/#review160821
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 4, 2017, 9:55 p.m., Aaron Wood wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/54996/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 4, 2017, 9:55 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6835
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6835
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Currently in the Linux launcher when the stack is allocated and prepared for 
> a call to clone() it is not properly aligned. This is not an issue for x86 or 
> x64 but for ARM64/AArch64 it is because of the requirement of having the 
> stack aligned to a 16 byte boundary. While x86 and x64 also expect the stack 
> to have a 16 byte aligned stack, it is not enforced. An explanation of the 
> stack and requirements for ARM64 can be found here 
> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0055b/IHI0055B_aapcs64.pdf
>  (specifically section 5.2.2.1 that says SP mod 16 = 0. The stack must be 
> quad-word aligned.)
> 
> Additionally, the way that the stack is currently allocated and passed to 
> clone() accidentally chops off one entry, making a stack overflow using those 
> missing 8 bytes a possibility. Fixing this while aligning the memory will fix 
> both the issue of the stack overflow issue as well as the SIGBUS crash. We 
> should also net better performance from having the stack aligned.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/linux.hpp 530f1a55b 
>   src/linux/ns.hpp 77789717e 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/54996/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Built Mesos from source and am currently running it in a test cluster. 
> Launched both Docker and Mesos tasks via Marathon without any resulting crash 
> (initial crash only happened with Mesos containerizer + linux_launcher, not 
> with the posix_launcher).
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aaron Wood
> 
>

Reply via email to