> On Jan. 11, 2017, 10:11 a.m., Jiang Yan Xu wrote:
> > I feel if we keep `os::system()` in the codebase at all, this is one of the 
> > few places it could actually be used... we could eliminate it so we can say 
> > there's no references to `os::systems()` left today but it's a bit harsh to 
> > nit-picking on future use like this in order to keep a "clean state"?
> 
> James Peach wrote:
>     I don't consider this harsh, just a minor, obvious improvement. While 
> `system()` is safe, `spawn()` is slightly better because it doesn't use the 
> shell. We can't completely eliminate `system()` because there are places that 
> actually require the shell (eg. the port mapping CNI plugin).
> 
> Jiang Yan Xu wrote:
>     OK I guess if the command is a static string and trivial enough *and some 
> shell features make it easier to write* then os::system still fine. For this 
> case yes we can replace it.

As long as `ifconfig` is guaranteed to be an elf binary and not a script I 
think this should be ok. Looked at a few distributions and seems like that is 
the case.


- Avinash


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/55238/#review161200
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 12, 2017, 12:26 a.m., James Peach wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/55238/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 12, 2017, 12:26 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Avinash sridharan and Jiang Yan Xu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6862
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6862
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Use os::spawn in the CNI isolator.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/network/cni/cni.cpp 
> ea91c71fdfac48a2fc1d31a0ee088a73244be367 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/55238/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `sudo make check` (Fedora 25)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> James Peach
> 
>

Reply via email to