> On Jan. 13, 2017, 9:17 a.m., Jay Guo wrote:
> > When a resource with `*` is offered to a multi-role framework, how does the 
> > framework decide which role to reserve the resource for?

Frameworks with default role cannot reserve resources; this is the first check 
in the validation function being updated in this patch.


- Benjamin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/55461/#review161489
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 13, 2017, 4:50 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/55461/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 13, 2017, 4:50 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler, Jay Guo, and Guangya Liu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6730
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6730
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This updates the resource reservation validation for frameworks which
> can have multiple roles. During a deprecation period 'FrameworkInfo'
> will have fields for both 'role' and 'roles', however the validation
> function works with just an optional set of roles. Here an empty set
> captures the previous semantics of either having an empty 'role' field
> or 'role' set as '*'. This forces the callers to properly construct a
> set of framework roles from the available information. An optional set
> is used in order to accommodate callers which have no information
> about the framework's roles, and ultimately disables validation taking
> that information into account.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.cpp 1746a88953dbdc148d98881bcf7027b62ad6b040 
>   src/master/validation.hpp 57e81779ff7444904c2ad7bad33aaf9167b98d05 
>   src/master/validation.cpp 96aa36585ded4bd7cf98526f710ccbc4f23b1f0f 
>   src/tests/master_validation_tests.cpp 
> e5d55e03648cb218d42adc594d6fa7d40ea9bcbb 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/55461/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Bannier
> 
>

Reply via email to