-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/55030/#review162883
-----------------------------------------------------------



This review is partially un-done by https://reviews.apache.org/r/55604/ .  Can 
you separate the source-grouping changes into 
https://reviews.apache.org/r/55604/ ?  And leave the CMake lists rearrangement 
in this review?

- Joseph Wu


On Jan. 15, 2017, 12:47 a.m., Alex Clemmer wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/55030/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 15, 2017, 12:47 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Andrew Schwartzmeyer, Daniel Pravat, John Kordich, 
> and Joseph Wu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3542
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3542
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Currently in IDEs such as XCode and Visual Studio, all mesos source
> files are grouped into one huge folder, with no attempt made to reflect
> the hierarchy of folders that exist on disk.
> 
> This commit groups libprocess files into relevant source groups so that
> they appear in a sensible directory structure in these IDEs.
> 
> In addition to beginning to directly address MESOS-3542, this is also
> (indirectly) the first step towards addressing the problem of breaking
> libmesos up into smaller binaries (MESOS-3542).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/cmake/ProcessConfigure.cmake 
> 873f41d844faa0d442f77411e94314a89be5f046 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/CMakeLists.txt 
> 60f0e76dfd237d9a12a366b413802d1a96892b55 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/CMakeLists.txt 
> 0b2660cb16f5d8d8dc66e6995061d0b832182351 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/55030/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alex Clemmer
> 
>

Reply via email to