> On Feb. 17, 2017, 10:51 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/network/port_mapping.cpp, line 1597
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/56493/diff/4/?file=1638725#file1638725line1597>
> >
> >     We don't add period in log lines.

Sorry for that. I see that you've already merged.


> On Feb. 17, 2017, 10:51 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/network/port_mapping.cpp, lines 
> > 1601-1602
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/56493/diff/4/?file=1638725#file1638725line1601>
> >
> >     I would still return Error here.

I do not agree on that part. Here is what I experience and it's the reason of 
this review:
```
$ ls -la /sys/class/net/team0/speed
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Feb 20 12:17 /sys/class/net/team0/speed
# file /sys/class/net/team0/speed
/sys/class/net/team0/speed: ERROR: cannot read (Invalid argument)
# cat /sys/class/net/team0/speed
cat: /sys/class/net/team0/speed: Invalid argument
```


- Pierre


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56493/#review165973
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 17, 2017, 3:51 p.m., Pierre Cheynier wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/56493/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 17, 2017, 3:51 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7074
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7074
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Since a lot of environments do not provide interface speed in
> /sys/class/net/<ifname>/speed`.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/network/port_mapping.cpp 
> f6f2bfe1d5d3c113036ad44a480f97bbb462a269 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56493/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> ./configure
> make -j 8
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Pierre Cheynier
> 
>

Reply via email to