-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56027/#review168359
-----------------------------------------------------------




3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/stat.hpp
Lines 20-21 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/56027/#comment240574>

    Updated the comment to make it clearer that we are talking about how this 
is used in the `os::stat` API family.



3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/stat.hpp
Lines 21-22 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/56027/#comment240576>

    This is trying to document that the flag only means that we use te 
O_NOFOLLOW flag. The semantics of this are that it doesn't follow the last path 
component if that is a symlink. Intermediate path symlinks are always followed.
    
    I removed the comment, since it probably raises more questions than answers.


- James Peach


On Feb. 2, 2017, 12:46 a.m., James Peach wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/56027/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 2, 2017, 12:46 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alex Clemmer, Joris Van Remoortere, Joseph Wu, 
> Michael Park, and Jiang Yan Xu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7021
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7021
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Consistently add the FollowSymlink stat argument on POSIX.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/posix/stat.hpp 
> e7440a4dab82ca3758a60a8fdc859476b2ee5693 
>   3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/stat.hpp 
> 5c4fd4e630459059fa94c9f98e0d9b73d1280918 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56027/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check (Fedora 25)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> James Peach
> 
>

Reply via email to