-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/57646/#review169959
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/checks/health_checker.cpp
Lines 362-364 (original), 366-367 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/57646/#comment242682>

    I'm not sure this formatting is superior to what was before.



src/checks/health_checker.cpp
Lines 560 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/57646/#comment242681>

    Is this necessary?



src/checks/health_checker.cpp
Line 617 (original), 618 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/57646/#comment242683>

    Please either trailing or leading undescore.



src/checks/health_checker.cpp
Lines 646-651 (original), 649-654 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/57646/#comment242684>

    It would be great to keep argument list sorted in the same way across all 
continuations, e.g. `promise` beign the first.


- Alexander Rukletsov


On March 23, 2017, 8:07 p.m., Gastón Kleiman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/57646/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 23, 2017, 8:07 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Anand Mazumdar, haosdent 
> huang, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6280
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6280
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Made COMMAND health checks resilient to agent failovers.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/checks/health_checker.hpp 44df544b585b8c9f1138fc69b34b064bae8cc867 
>   src/checks/health_checker.cpp a26e9b570ea3a0ee775d220a3b523ae7052dad23 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/57646/diff/5/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check` in Linux
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gastón Kleiman
> 
>

Reply via email to