-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/58040/#review170913
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Let's get these in as they are strictly improvements.

To make such changes cheaper in the future I am strongly in favor of making a 
sweep across the code base, and default-enable a new test catching future 
regressions in `support/mesos-tidy.sh`'s.

- Benjamin Bannier


On March 30, 2017, 3:15 a.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/58040/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 30, 2017, 3:15 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Benjamin Bannier.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Spotted using the "performance-unnecessary-copy-initialization"
> clang-tidy check.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/examples/dynamic_reservation_framework.cpp 
> c1650dc978dddf14cf1e22a33752b58b06914ff4 
>   src/master/master.hpp d92c8adef79d997f255cf26ebd10ab0e87da8413 
>   src/master/master.cpp ab071f56a66ae66c97a185b2377a9cfe9a5c1ade 
>   src/oci/spec.cpp 06fceb4f0441431d756eb45c8aaf9730ef9e248a 
>   src/tests/default_executor_tests.cpp 
> 6dadd8937eb6809bcb0aca55fab1cb7f17c3262f 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58040/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Neil Conway
> 
>

Reply via email to