-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/57963/#review172681
-----------------------------------------------------------



LGTM!

Can we have a test? It doesn't have to be a standalone test if we already have 
a test that just launches tasks from two frameworks, then we can just add it to 
the test? If not seems like that's proper test to have in general?


src/master/master.cpp
Lines 8896 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/57963/#comment245735>

    s/same/the same/?



src/slave/slave.cpp
Lines 6703 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/57963/#comment245733>

    The `slave` in `slaveUsed` seems redundant here (my example was on the 
master), here we have only one agent.
    
    s/slaveUsed/used/?



src/slave/slave.cpp
Lines 6747 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/57963/#comment245734>

    Ditto.


- Jiang Yan Xu


On March 27, 2017, 3:27 p.m., Anindya Sinha wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/57963/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 27, 2017, 3:27 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Jiang Yan Xu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7186
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7186
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The following metrics take the shared counts of shared resources into
> account in determination of the actual amount of used resources:
> a) `master/<resource-name>_used`
> b) `master/<resource-name>_revocable_used`
> c) `slave/<resource-name>_used`
> d) `slave/<resource-name>_revocable_used`
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.cpp 43e9d26167c1f405329ea05224c22e7b8c65315f 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp c8479d7e8eb915284f0ea8cf75f47acd679dee7e 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/57963/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> All tests passed.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anindya Sinha
> 
>

Reply via email to