-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/57963/#review173028
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!





src/master/master.cpp
Lines 8950 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/57963/#comment246114>

    s/same/the same/ I forgot to say "all ocurrences".



src/slave/slave.cpp
Line 6743 (original), 6743 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/57963/#comment246510>

    Perhaps I am pedantic but I think s/used/Resources arithmetic/ here is more 
clear. When I read "We use `used`" my immediate reaction was "instead of what?" 
because `used` is the only variable here. The comment is basically to remind 
the reader of the "magic" of Resources::+= so perhaps just directly say it?
    
    We could use the same wording for the `slaveUsed` case above so all of 
these comments are consistent (which was my original suggestion).


- Jiang Yan Xu


On April 22, 2017, 10 a.m., Anindya Sinha wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/57963/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 22, 2017, 10 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Jiang Yan Xu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7186
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7186
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The following metrics take the shared counts of shared resources into
> account in determination of the actual amount of used resources:
> a) `master/<resource-name>_used`
> b) `master/<resource-name>_revocable_used`
> c) `slave/<resource-name>_used`
> d) `slave/<resource-name>_revocable_used`
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.cpp d1cdc35a066e190ef8e0bd788e07e63b92f7fce7 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp 4ff522e75bc8de34fe2e7720bdd8ce3d32cbf803 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/57963/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> All tests passed.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anindya Sinha
> 
>

Reply via email to