-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/58709/#review173601
-----------------------------------------------------------



Patch looks great!

Reviews applied: [58897, 58707, 58708, 58709]

Passed command: export OS='ubuntu:14.04' BUILDTOOL='autotools' COMPILER='gcc' 
CONFIGURATION='--verbose' ENVIRONMENT='GLOG_v=1 MESOS_VERBOSE=1'; 
./support/docker-build.sh

- Mesos Reviewbot


On May 1, 2017, 11:45 p.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/58709/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 1, 2017, 11:45 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler and Kapil Arya.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6976
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6976
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Officially, Mesos 1.0.0 (and newer) masters do not support pre-1.0.0
> Mesos agents. However, we previously allowed old agents to register,
> which resulted in several master crashes. As a short-term solution, we
> fixed those crashes by adding backward compatibility mechanisms into the
> master, but that backward compatibility code has made the master logic
> more complicated and difficult to understand.
> 
> This commit changes the master to ignore registration attempts by Mesos
> agents that precede Mesos 1.0.0. Now that this safety check is in place,
> master logic can safely assume that all agents are running at least
> Mesos 1.0.0, which will allow several simplifications to be made.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/constants.hpp 7edf9f65f6615b67ad0663f75ea7ee72a6a558cb 
>   src/master/master.cpp 31a7a2fcf905c0c35e80692a69c290d4094deded 
>   src/tests/master_tests.cpp 7cb4774fae1feff007adacf6521fadde2f58bee7 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58709/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Neil Conway
> 
>

Reply via email to