> On April 17, 2017, 11:49 a.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/tests/resources_tests.cpp
> > Lines 2255 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/58048/diff/3/?file=1685272#file1685272line2255>
> >
> >     instead of relying on 'count', let's use `size()` instead.
> 
> Qian Zhang wrote:
>     I think here the intention is to count how many `disks` are in `(r1 + 
> r2)`, so `count()` should be the right method to call.

Yes, exactly. Note that we could use `size` and explicit value checks here, but 
this would introduce dependencies to the exact disk values which in my opinion 
makes the code harder to understand.


- Benjamin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/58048/#review172076
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 19, 2017, 11:16 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/58048/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 19, 2017, 11:16 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Jan Schlicht.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7312
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7312
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Ids will allow to create distinguishable resources, e.g., of RAW or
> BLOCK type.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto e138e2aedb1369acdde82facf9dfea9780411154 
>   include/mesos/v1/mesos.proto ab617bfd2bc46e44f7d71cefecf5eac3630d22b3 
>   src/common/resources.cpp 1d07f1a049ba3bb3f5d78f05031f33ba97e07e8c 
>   src/tests/mesos.hpp 3c57f25ff0bec55582b8a7decef53be61a9ec6f4 
>   src/tests/resources_tests.cpp 5dcbce2dd4944194b59790551929d6d75b805ba3 
>   src/v1/resources.cpp 1bb5d0741c9f9ea59f34e92159a335661019444d 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58048/diff/4/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check (OS X, Fedora25)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Bannier
> 
>

Reply via email to