-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/53842/#review175889
-----------------------------------------------------------



Bad patch!

Reviews applied: [53842, 53841, 53840]

Failed command: python support/apply-reviews.py -n -r 53841

Error:
2017-05-24 01:12:56 URL:https://reviews.apache.org/r/53841/diff/raw/ 
[15004/15004] -> "53841.patch" [1]
error: patch failed: src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_tests.cpp:3580
error: src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_tests.cpp: patch does not apply

Full log: https://builds.apache.org/job/Mesos-Reviewbot/18159/console

- Mesos Reviewbot


On May 23, 2017, 4:30 p.m., Anindya Sinha wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/53842/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 23, 2017, 4:30 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, James Peach and Jiang Yan Xu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6579
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6579
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added the following 2 metrics which is maintained on a role level
> (as long as there is at least one framework of that role):
> a) allocator/mesos/frameworks/role/<role>/sort_runs: Number of framework
>    level sorts (based on role) in DRF Sorter.
> b) allocator/mesos/frameworks/role/<role>/sort_run: Latency in framework
>    level sorts (based on role) in DRF Sorter.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/monitoring.md a027f4905a0e6e41ff4e1348d34fd7aa5f1cbe61 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp 
> 123f97cf495bff0f822838e09df0d88818f04da6 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp 
> b75ed9a20a9a42f958cebbacd91e5e15b0d21394 
>   src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_tests.cpp 
> 6dee2296d5a14185dbf7eee17968b20148839bfd 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53842/diff/7/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> All tests passed.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anindya Sinha
> 
>

Reply via email to