-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/60003/#review177625
-----------------------------------------------------------



Patch looks great!

Reviews applied: [60002, 60003]

Passed command: support\windows-build.bat

- Mesos Reviewbot Windows


On June 12, 2017, 2:53 p.m., Dmitry Zhuk wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/60003/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 12, 2017, 2:53 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, haosdent huang and Michael Park.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Reduced copying in defer, dispatch and Future.
> 
> This reduces number of copies made for each parameter in a code like this:
> future.then(defer(pid, &SomeProcess::someMethod, param1, param2));
> 
> For the objects that do not support move semantics (e.g. protobuf messages), 
> number of copies is reduced from 8-10 to 6. If move semantics is supported, 
> then number of copies is reduced from 6-7 to 1 if parameter is passed with 
> std::move, or 2 otherwise.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/defer.hpp 
> 7f3369e723cb244e97930621cbba89cf7873567d 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/deferred.hpp 
> e446621be11ac51f5f91c417cc8975e363c2f715 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/dispatch.hpp 
> 3a0793888dc0df5e3ec31b06f47cd920c71e0db9 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/future.hpp 
> cce950509f58022e79bb51a6e72ea1a005b9cb50 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/http.hpp 
> f637999174d92a98208b5fc49a65f9929efb11a0 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60003/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> Number of copies was checked by using defer to subscribe process for Future 
> callbacks, and passing parameters that count number of copies made.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dmitry Zhuk
> 
>

Reply via email to