> On June 13, 2017, 6:42 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/launcher/default_executor.cpp
> > Lines 371 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/59949/diff/1/?file=1746882#file1746882line371>
> >
> >     I'd add a TODO here. Because for bridge mode, `self().address.ip` might 
> > be the advertise IP (i.e., agent IP), which is not what we've wanted here.

>From a CNI perspective the BRIDGE mode is just another CNI network, so the 
>self().address.ip will be the IP on the BRIDGE network which is what is 
>expected. So for the time being dropping this comment. Please open if you 
>still feel this is an issue.


> On June 13, 2017, 6:42 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/launcher/default_executor.cpp
> > Lines 438 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/59949/diff/1/?file=1746882#file1746882line438>
> >
> >     Let's add a TODO to document this Downward API.

Instead of a TODO, should we just create a JIRA and add it to the CNI 
documentation and the executor documentation?


- Avinash


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/59949/#review177778
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 9, 2017, 6:39 p.m., Avinash sridharan wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/59949/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 9, 2017, 6:39 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7631
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7631
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added `MESOS_CONTAINER_IP` to tasks launched by `DefaultExecutor`.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/launcher/default_executor.cpp 1a60e3bb2b0e8312b349cddedb4cd55716c1b574 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59949/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Avinash sridharan
> 
>

Reply via email to