> On Aug. 5, 2017, 8:33 a.m., Gilbert Song wrote: > > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/namespaces/pid.cpp > > Lines 130 (patched) > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/61428/diff/2/?file=1789465#file1789465line132> > > > > Could we reverse two logics above? so that we can avoid the size check > > here. E.g., > > ``` > > if (sharePidNamespace) { > > return launchInfo; > > } > > ``` > > > > similar to the short circuit logic for DEBUG container.
Could you elaborate a bit more? Which two logics are you talking about? - Qian ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61428/#review182235 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Aug. 5, 2017, 12:39 a.m., Qian Zhang wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/61428/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 5, 2017, 12:39 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Gastón Kleiman, Gilbert Song, Jie Yu, Kevin Klues, > and Vinod Kone. > > > Bugs: MESOS-7853 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7853 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Added pid ns sharing based on agent flag and protobuf message field. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/namespaces/pid.hpp > 2b316dbdf4a3735771af5bed80c6251d0d1cbd50 > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/namespaces/pid.cpp > f1dfc9f7398ffc029d7180d7f014a515338cb3f4 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61428/diff/2/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Qian Zhang > >
