> On Aug. 18, 2017, 12:47 p.m., Till Toenshoff wrote: > > include/mesos/v1/master/master.proto > > Line 362 (original), 362 (patched) > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/61733/diff/1/?file=1799983#file1799983line362> > > > > Is there any documentation around our deprecation cycles? > > I kind of understand that these pubic promises should be handled with > > very long deprecation but why a 2.0 and not a 1.2 + N (e.g. 3). We need to > > be clear and have this publically documented I believe. > > > > If there was no JIRA around it, we should create one.
Dropping the issues since the RR just syncs the two files. We should file a separate JIRA to fix those. - Kapil ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61733/#review183228 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Aug. 18, 2017, 9:32 a.m., Kapil Arya wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/61733/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 18, 2017, 9:32 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar and Till Toenshoff. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Synchronized comment in v1 and unversioned master.proto. > > > Diffs > ----- > > include/mesos/v1/master/master.proto > c3fb31de2509adcdec8204f8bbe46b46a31540e8 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61733/diff/1/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Kapil Arya > >