-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/60888/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Nov. 2, 2017, 8:43 a.m.)


Review request for mesos, Gilbert Song and Jie Yu.


Changes
-------

Fixed recovery for nested containers launched underneath standalone containers. 
 These nested containers were not being marked as `isRecoverableNestedContainer 
= true` because the set of "alive" containers is determined from the 
`SlaveState`, which does not include standalone containers.  To fix this, the 
`alive` hashset was removed, because, for the purpose of finding the top-level 
container, the existing `containers_` hashmap is sufficient.


Bugs: MESOS-7305
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7305


Repository: mesos


Description
-------

Although there is no way to launch standalone containers yet,
this commit outlines the expected layout of container metadata
which should be populated when launching standalone containers.

The layout is fairly simple, as standalone containers have no
framework, executor, or tasks to worry about.  The sandbox directory
will live under a new top-level directory `containers` and there is
no metadata to checkpoint at the moment.

The containerizer will checkpoint a marker file (in the runtime
directory) so that it knows to recover all standalone containers.


Diffs (updated)
-----

  src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp 
100e3bbda543d87808da9ff6bea42da5099ea8c5 
  src/slave/containerizer/mesos/paths.hpp 
a03f15e01e8eb8a1326baad8d7db96a79d785482 
  src/slave/containerizer/mesos/paths.cpp 
0c61c20c345a327ec469b382558aaeed0280e754 
  src/slave/paths.hpp f000508d414daf9f943561f89c7105503a8a98b3 
  src/slave/paths.cpp fd546525b900cb6524fb9196d19616ef18de0f30 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60888/diff/4/

Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60888/diff/3-4/


Testing
-------

See next patch and later ones too.


Thanks,

Joseph Wu

Reply via email to